![]() Elsewhere, stalemate was evolving into a draw, though some regional variants was referring to stalemate as a win for the giver. Has anyone stumbled across this bug ADK 0 2 Not that I know of. As I was fooling around with it earlier today, it awarded me checkmate when in fact the computer's King not in check. ![]() The rule that stalemate would be a loss for the giver hung around in England and the U.S. until the early 1800s. 1 The Computer doesn't seem to recognize stalemate vs. ![]() The idea that a player could win by forcing a self-stalemate was put forth in some English literature as a legitimate stratagem, considering several different endgame scenarios where a player might even "win by a stale.” Other ideas around the time thought that differentiating between giving stalemate, versus being stalemated, added another challenge to skill. Peter Pratt was still defending that stalemate was a loss by the giver in 1805, saying it was reasonable to have a rule that helped the weaker player, presumably since the possibility of giving stalemate was more likely for the player with the stronger position. However, despite “stale” being the only type of mate on his list that was not a checkmate, Barbier’s inclusion of “stale” on his list of “mates” helped influence the term “stale-mate” in later English chess literature.Įnglish master Philip Stamma in 1745 composed a position in which White wins either by checkmate or by forcing self-stalemate, depending on Black's move. "he hath unadvisably stopped the course of the game which is to end only by the grand checkmate."īarbier went on to state that a stale is a "Monstrous mate, that is, a mate, and no mate, or end of play, but no end of the game." In other words, Barbier thought the player giving a stale should be punished with a loss, because he'd prevented further play in a game before it was properly ended. John Barbier’s reprint of The Famous Game of Chesse-Play in 1640 had a similar section on the "diversity of Mates,” but with some change in adjectives: mates by the queen became "gracious," and the knight, "gallant.” In the mate section, Barbier also included "The Stale, a dishonourable Mate,” adding that stalemate is a loss for the giver, because ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |